Principal Lawyer Justin Quill comments on possible national review to balance defamation laws
2 mins reading time
Source: The Australian
Principal Lawyer Justin Quill commented in The Australian regarding a possible review of defamation laws. A parliamentary committee has urged this review should look to to ensure the laws do not hinder public-interest journalism, as it is argued that defamation laws “played a significant part in curtailing journalists’ efforts to pursue public interest stories”.
Justin said news organisations faced huge costs as a result of defamation claims, even if they were successfully defended.
“It is much harder to defend a defamation claim than to bring one,” he said.
“A media organisation can spend millions of dollars defending a single action. And quite often, these costs are not recoverable.”
To read the full article, click here (paywall).
The information contained in this article is general in nature and cannot be relied on as legal advice nor does it create an engagement. Please contact one of our lawyers listed above for advice about your specific situation.
more
insights
Macpherson Kelley client finds success in Court after 10 year tax dispute
Macpherson Kelley advises on acquisition of Stillwell Motor Group by Autosports Group
Macpherson Kelley expands national team with three senior appointments across Property, Litigation, and Tax
stay up to date with our news & insights
Principal Lawyer Justin Quill comments on possible national review to balance defamation laws
Source: The Australian
Principal Lawyer Justin Quill commented in The Australian regarding a possible review of defamation laws. A parliamentary committee has urged this review should look to to ensure the laws do not hinder public-interest journalism, as it is argued that defamation laws “played a significant part in curtailing journalists’ efforts to pursue public interest stories”.
Justin said news organisations faced huge costs as a result of defamation claims, even if they were successfully defended.
“It is much harder to defend a defamation claim than to bring one,” he said.
“A media organisation can spend millions of dollars defending a single action. And quite often, these costs are not recoverable.”
To read the full article, click here (paywall).