book a meeting Search Search
brisbane

level 16, 324 queen st,
brisbane qld 4000
+61 7 3235 0400

dandenong

40-42 scott st,
dandenong vic 3175
+61 3 9794 2600

melbourne

level 7, 600 bourke st,
melbourne vic 3000
+61 3 8615 9900

sydney

level 21, 20 bond st,
sydney nsw 2000
+61 2 8298 9533

hello. we’re glad you’re
getting in touch.

Fill in form below, or simply call us on 1800 888 966

ACCC pulls trigger on first ‘gun-jumping’ cartel conduct case

06 August 2018
jason kaye
Read Time 2 mins reading time

Recently the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) brought its first ‘gun-jumping’ proceeding against Cryosite Limited (Cryosite) for alleged cartel conduct relating to Cryosite’s entry into an asset sale agreement with Cell Care Australia Pty Ltd (Cell Care).

This proceeding provides a timely reminder to merging entities to remain independent and not to combine or coordinate their conduct before the actual completion of the merger transaction, as the engagement in premature conduct may amount to “gun jumping”.

In this case, Cryosite signed an agreement to sell its assets in its cord blood and tissue banking business to Cell Care. On signing the agreement, Cell Care made an upfront, non-refundable payment of $500,000 to Cryosite. The asset sale agreement required Cryosite to refer all customer enquiries to Cell Care after the agreement was signed but before the acquisition was formally completed. Cell Care was further restrained from dealing with any Cryosite customer who had cord blood and tissue stored with Cryosite, and the companies agreed that Cell Care would not market to Cryosite’s existing customers.

The ACCC has alleged Cryosite and Cell Care have ‘jumped the gun’, and the competitive restraints and ancillary agreement reached amount to cartel conduct because it restricted Cryosite’s supply of cord blood and tissue banking services and allocated potential customers from Cryosite to Cell Care.

The notion of gun jumping has been quite prominent in other jurisdictions around the world; however Australian’s first gun jumping case emphasises the importance of managing the risks in mergers or acquisitions.

At Macpherson Kelley, we are well equipped to advise and assist in developing appropriate practices to ensure compliance throughout the entire process of a merger or acquisition. If you have any questions relating to mergers, ‘gun-jumping’ or potential cartel conduct, please contact us.

This article was written by Jason Kaye, Lawyer – Commercial. 

stay up to date with our news & insights

ACCC pulls trigger on first ‘gun-jumping’ cartel conduct case

06 August 2018
jason kaye

Recently the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) brought its first ‘gun-jumping’ proceeding against Cryosite Limited (Cryosite) for alleged cartel conduct relating to Cryosite’s entry into an asset sale agreement with Cell Care Australia Pty Ltd (Cell Care).

This proceeding provides a timely reminder to merging entities to remain independent and not to combine or coordinate their conduct before the actual completion of the merger transaction, as the engagement in premature conduct may amount to “gun jumping”.

In this case, Cryosite signed an agreement to sell its assets in its cord blood and tissue banking business to Cell Care. On signing the agreement, Cell Care made an upfront, non-refundable payment of $500,000 to Cryosite. The asset sale agreement required Cryosite to refer all customer enquiries to Cell Care after the agreement was signed but before the acquisition was formally completed. Cell Care was further restrained from dealing with any Cryosite customer who had cord blood and tissue stored with Cryosite, and the companies agreed that Cell Care would not market to Cryosite’s existing customers.

The ACCC has alleged Cryosite and Cell Care have ‘jumped the gun’, and the competitive restraints and ancillary agreement reached amount to cartel conduct because it restricted Cryosite’s supply of cord blood and tissue banking services and allocated potential customers from Cryosite to Cell Care.

The notion of gun jumping has been quite prominent in other jurisdictions around the world; however Australian’s first gun jumping case emphasises the importance of managing the risks in mergers or acquisitions.

At Macpherson Kelley, we are well equipped to advise and assist in developing appropriate practices to ensure compliance throughout the entire process of a merger or acquisition. If you have any questions relating to mergers, ‘gun-jumping’ or potential cartel conduct, please contact us.

This article was written by Jason Kaye, Lawyer – Commercial.