book a virtual meeting Search Search
brisbane

one eagle – waterfront brisbane
level 30, 1 eagle street
brisbane qld 4000
+61 7 3235 0400

dandenong

40-42 scott st,
dandenong vic 3175
+61 3 9794 2600

melbourne

level 7, 600 bourke st,
melbourne vic 3000
+61 3 8615 9900

sydney

grosvenor place
level 11, 225 george st,
sydney nsw 2000
+61 2 8298 9533

hello. we’re glad you’re
getting in touch.

Fill in form below, or simply call us on 1800 888 966

Words matter: Honda Australia pays $6m for misleading statements

05 June 2024
Kelly Dickson
Read Time 1 mins reading time

Continuing its focus on the motor vehicle industry, the ACCC has also recently been successful against Honda Australia (Honda), with the Federal Court finding that Honda engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, and made false or misleading representations to customers.

What were the misleading statements in this case?

In 2021, Honda re-structured its Australian operations from a franchising model to an agency model for new vehicles. This is similar to what Mercedes Benz has also done in the Australian marketplace.  As part of the restructure, Honda terminated some of its franchise agreements with authorised dealers, including the dealerships of Astoria, Tynan and Burswood.

In various phone calls, emails and vehicle service reminder text messages to Astoria, Tynan and Burswood customers, Honda made statements including:

“…Your previous service dealer has closed so please find your nearest Honda Service Centre here…”

The Federal Court accepted that this type of statement was variously false, misleading and deceptive to customers. It was NOT the case that the dealerships had closed or were closing. Rather, the Astoria, Tynan and Burswood dealerships continued to operate as independent service centres to service and repair vehicles (including Honda vehicles) – just not under the authorised dealership model.

Why did the ACCC take action?

The ACCC took action against Honda because it considered that Honda’s statements misled consumers and financially harmed the dealerships. Astoria and Tynan had each been authorised Honda dealerships for approximately 50 years, and the $6M penalty handed down to Honda likely took that into account.

Key takeaways

It isn’t just silly semantics – businesses are reminded that “words matter” – you need to take care to make sure your statements and representations are truthful and accurate.

If you would like legal advice regarding specific wording for your business, Macpherson Kelley has specific expertise in the Motor Dealer industry. Contact our lawyers for industry specific advice.

The information contained in this article is general in nature and cannot be relied on as legal advice nor does it create an engagement. Please contact one of our lawyers listed above for advice about your specific situation.

stay up to date with our news & insights

Words matter: Honda Australia pays $6m for misleading statements

05 June 2024
Kelly Dickson

Continuing its focus on the motor vehicle industry, the ACCC has also recently been successful against Honda Australia (Honda), with the Federal Court finding that Honda engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, and made false or misleading representations to customers.

What were the misleading statements in this case?

In 2021, Honda re-structured its Australian operations from a franchising model to an agency model for new vehicles. This is similar to what Mercedes Benz has also done in the Australian marketplace.  As part of the restructure, Honda terminated some of its franchise agreements with authorised dealers, including the dealerships of Astoria, Tynan and Burswood.

In various phone calls, emails and vehicle service reminder text messages to Astoria, Tynan and Burswood customers, Honda made statements including:

“…Your previous service dealer has closed so please find your nearest Honda Service Centre here…”

The Federal Court accepted that this type of statement was variously false, misleading and deceptive to customers. It was NOT the case that the dealerships had closed or were closing. Rather, the Astoria, Tynan and Burswood dealerships continued to operate as independent service centres to service and repair vehicles (including Honda vehicles) – just not under the authorised dealership model.

Why did the ACCC take action?

The ACCC took action against Honda because it considered that Honda’s statements misled consumers and financially harmed the dealerships. Astoria and Tynan had each been authorised Honda dealerships for approximately 50 years, and the $6M penalty handed down to Honda likely took that into account.

Key takeaways

It isn’t just silly semantics – businesses are reminded that “words matter” – you need to take care to make sure your statements and representations are truthful and accurate.

If you would like legal advice regarding specific wording for your business, Macpherson Kelley has specific expertise in the Motor Dealer industry. Contact our lawyers for industry specific advice.